Attractive People Are More Successful. Really?


Beautiful people, both men and women, tend to earn more than those with average looks. They also get hired sooner, get promoted quicker, sell more, and even get a bank loan more easily than their less attractive counterparts. Believe that? Surprisingly there's substantial research to support the theory!

I have to say that I was surprised by the amount of solid research that supports the idea that physically attractive people are more successful. What made me research this a little was a conversation with a CEO of a well known global company. She insisted that anybody she hires into the company should have good looks. When I work with companies they often ask for my help in filling senior positions for Chief Strategy Officers, Chief Performance Officers, or Chief Data Scientists, etc. and looks was never one of my search criteria. But maybe it should be...here is why:

Research compiled by economics professor Daniel Hamermesh and published in his book Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful, shows very convincingly that beautiful people earn a higher salary than average looking folk. He also shows that good looking individuals are employed sooner, get promoted more quickly, and tend to have higher ranking jobs in companies. His work also confirms that attractive employees tend to bring in more money for their companies, and therefore will be seen as more successful. What's more, this bias towards beauty goes beyond our careers. Hamermesh's research even shows that beautiful people are more likely to have successful loan applications and pay lower interest rates than less beautiful people (even if everything else is equal).

In other research, Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist at London School of Economics, shows that beautiful people tend to have higher intelligence than ugly people (especially if they are men). Furthermore, researchers David Ruth and Amy Hodges at Rice University show that people with more beautiful faces are more likely to be successful in job interviews.

So why should this be? Professor Dario Maestripieri from the University of Chicago concludes in his article 'The truth about why beautiful people are more successful' that it comes down to the 'sex factor'. He basically argues that attractive people are more appealing as potential sex partners. This means that subconsciously (or not) we chose to interact and do business with attractive rather than ugly people - because it increases our chances to have sex with them.

Whether the 'sex factor' conclusion is the right one or not, it looks as if beauty might be seen as a key to success. So was my CEO client right to demand only beautiful candidates? I am still not convinced yet, but are you? Do you feel it's time to up-date your LinkedIn profile picture and have a beauty make-over? What is your view on this? Would you hire someone for their looks? Are you more likely to buy from a beautiful sales person? Are we biased towards attractive people or is this discrimination that needs to be stopped?

Myriam Blancquaert

Multilingual PA/EA Sr: EU institutions policy/reg.coop-procurement-HR selection& recruitment- translation, training and development, corporate law, pharmaceutical marketing,, telecom banking/financial, maritime

1y

it depends if you want to sell a product and need people dealing a lot with the public, it is true that especially men will be biased. According to studies even babies look longer at beautiful people. No but seriously, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder so I do think there should be a good mix of an inclusive society not discriminating on gender, race, handicap or age cause there's a lot of talent there. Ps by the way some women may also be influenced more by a good looking man good example, the coca cola add.

Like
Reply
Mogambal Choken

Customs Officer I Mauritius Revenue Authority

10y

It is an unethical attitude towards people management. By adopting these kind of practices in recruiting people ,you will end up with an organisation that has not been successful in attracting and retaining the best talents and most obviously leading to an organisation with poor performers in different domains.

Ashish Kushwaha

Process Engineer | Polymer Scientist | Material Scientist | Data Analyst

10y

Totally agree, subconsciously, everyone is a little biased in favor of a good looking person, or a woman (if it is between a man and a woman). That is very embedded bias in human nature. One of my professors told me that while deciding the "grades for everyday class perfromance", one should be strictly sticking to the how the student is performing in the class, but he always gave slightly better grades if the student is good looking.

Like
Reply
Bella B.

Real Estate Finance

10y

Interesting theory of Satoshi Kanazawa's "beautiful people tend to have higher intelligence than ugly people (especially if they are men). But in China, we have a completely opposite theory, stating that "Males' IQ is inversely proportional to their looks." And amazingly, none of the billion worth CEOs in this country can be called beautiful or attractive. On the contrary, most of the rich fall into the so-called "ugly" category in looks. How do you explain that? Yes, it's a fact that physically attractive people are having an edge over average looking people in many aspects, but it does NOT mean it is supposed to be like that ! It's ridiculous that management in companies make their hiring decisions based on candidates' looks, and even more ridiculous that scientists are using their theories to back this up ! What message exactly are you sending to the society? CEOs, or whomever hires, if candidates' looks are what you are concerned about, then stop being so hypocritical and pull off that "equal opportunities" banner from your websites!

Arya nair

Marketing & Communications Leader | Brand Custodian | StoryTeller | Integrated Marketing Campaign specialist | Copywriter | MarTech loyalist | Marketeer on somedays & Marketer on Others

10y

¨Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder¨, so what´s beautiful for one may not be for someone else. totally subjective that´s what i feel of this situation

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics