Skip to main content

Adaptation as Climate Risk Management : Methods and Approaches

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation

Abstract

This chapter highlights the benefits of framing adaptation to climate change as an issue of climate risk management and describes a number of methods and approaches that may be applied in the process of developing adaptation strategies. A key consideration when developing adaptation strategies is to have a sound understanding of how a given system functions in response to changes in both climate and non-climate factors, and thus the need for a causal model which represents this understanding. There are a range of methods and tools that may be applied to assist with developing this system understanding in a climate risk assessment, and a number of these are described here. Moreover, given that adaptation planning is to a large degree about forward planning, all adaptation strategies will need to appropriately consider the implications of uncertainty on their likely effectiveness. This chapter provides a discussion of the ways in which adaptation strategies can be developed and decisions made when appraising different adaptation strategies. As such, it provides a basis upon which users can assess how they may approach adaptation as an issue of climate risk management and select and apply suitable methods. It provides a useful accompaniment to any practitioner or organization, as they proceed on their adaptation journey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger WN et al (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 717–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer, P et al (2014) The Role of Climate Services in Adapting to Climate Variability and Change, In this volume

    Google Scholar 

  • CCSP (2009) Best practice approaches for characterizing, communicating, and incorporating scientific uncertainty in decision making. [Granger Morgan M (Lead author), Dowlatabadi H, Henrion M, Keith D, Lempert R, McBride S, Small M, Wilbanks T (Contributing authors)]. A report by the climate change science program and the subcommittee on global change research. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC, 96 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Challinor AJ et al (2009) Methods and resources for climate impacts research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:836–848. doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2403.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins M et al (2012) Quantifying future climate change. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1414

    Google Scholar 

  • Coumou D, Rahmstorf S (2012) A decade of weather extremes. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1452

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow K et al (2013) Limits to adaptation. Nat Clim Change 3:305–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler H et al (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fronzek S et al (2010) Applying probabilistic projections of climate change with impact models: a case study for sub-arctic palsa mires in Fennoscandia. Clim Change 99:515–534. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9679-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1095–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Synthesis Report. In: Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Climate Change 2007: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 104

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, 582 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 31000 (2009) Risk management – principles and guidelines. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43170

  • ISO 31010 (2009) Risk management – risk assessment techniques. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?ics1=03&ics2=100&ics3=01&csnumber=51073

  • Jacob D et al (2013) EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research. Reg Environ Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RN (2001) An environmental risk assessment/management framework for climate change impact assessments. Nat Hazard 23:197–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RN, Preston BL (2011) Adaptation and risk management. WIREs Clim Change 2:296–308. doi:10.1002/wcc.97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther H et al (2013) Risk management and climate change. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1740

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Groves DG (2010) Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77:960–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert R et al (2004) Characterizing climate-change uncertainties for decision-makers. Clim Change 65:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ et al (2006) A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manag Sci 52(4):514–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizumi T et al (2013) Prediction of seasonal climate-induced variations in global food production. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1945

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone EL, Engle NL (2011) Evaluating regional vulnerability to climate change: purposes and methods. WIREs Clim Change 2:462–474. doi:10.1002/wcc.116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels T et al (2012) Using expert judgments to explore robust alternatives for forest management under climate change. Risk Anal 32(12):2098–2112. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01822.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuffie K, Henderson-Sellers A (2005) A Climate Modelling Primer, Third Edition. Wiley, pp 296

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA et al (2009) Decadal prediction, can it be skilful? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1467–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Boykoff MT (2013) Successful adaptation to climate change linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:22026–22031, http://www.pnas.org/content/107/51/22026

  • Moss R et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756. doi:10.1038/nature08823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakićenović N et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 600 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2010) Informing an effective response to climate change, America’s climate choices: panel on informing effective decisions and actions related to climate change. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill BC et al (2013) A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Prudhomme C et al (2010) Scenario-neutral approach to climate change impact studies: application to flood risk. J Hydrol 390:198–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmstorf S, Coumou D (2011) Increase of extreme events in a warming world. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(44):17905–17909, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1101766108

  • Reed M et al (2013) Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. J Environ Manag 128:345–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rounsevell MDA, Metzger MJ (2010) Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment. WIREs Clim Change 1:606–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A et al (2000) Sensitivity analysis. Wiley, Chichester, 494 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton DMH et al (2012) Multivariate probabilistic projections using imperfect climate models part I: outline of methodology. Clim Dyn 38(11–12):2513–2542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stainforth DA et al (2007) Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:2145–2161. doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson J (2013) The forecast for 2018 is cloudy with record heat. Nature 499:139–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden P, Mitchell JFB (2009) ENSEMBLES: Climate Change and its Impacts: Summary of Research and Results from the ENSEMBLES Project (Met Office Hadley Centre), Exeter, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet M et al (2012) Vulnerability of US and European electricity supply to climate change, Nature Climate Change, 2, 676–681, doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren D et al (2012) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver C et al (2013) Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks. WIREs Clim Change 4:39–60. doi:10.1002/wcc.202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willows R, Connell R (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP technical report. UKCIP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen E et al (2013) Climate change vulnerability assessments as catalysts for social learning: four case studies in south-eastern Australia. Mitig Adapt Strat Global Change 18:567–590. doi:10.1007/s11027-012-9376-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the work of the EU-funded FP6 integrated project ENSEMBLES (contract number 505539), from which Fig. 3 is reproduced.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Bowyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bowyer, P., Schaller, M., Bender, S., Jacob, D. (2015). Adaptation as Climate Risk Management : Methods and Approaches. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics