Guest editor
Kazuya Koyama
Upcoming galaxy surveys will probe the large-scale structures of the Universe on ever larger scales with ever greater precision. These surveys also probe galaxies at higher redshifts when the Hubble scale is smaller and general relativistic (GR) effects become more important. On such large scales, we need to rethink what we actually measure in galaxy surveys. We observe galaxies on the past light cone, and it is not possible to define an over-density of galaxies in the Newtonian way. The galaxy number counts contain various relativistic effects that are not accounted for in the standard formula based on Newtonian gravity. These GR corrections need to be taken into account consistently in order to extract cosmological information precisely. The formation of structure in the Universe has been studied using Newtonian N-body simulations. Once the box size of the simulations approaches the horizon scale, we need to ask how accurately Newtonian simulations can describe our Universe on such large scales. We also need to examine the Newtonian framework critically on small scales. Future galaxy surveys are attempting to measure the property of dark energy at an unprecedented level. This requires us to calculate the power spectrum of dark matter extremely accurately. Post-Newtonian effects might be important in studying non-linear gravitational instabilities in order to achieve this high level of accuracy.
There has been growing interest in answering these questions recently, driven by the rapid progress in galaxy surveys. This focus issue summarizes the recent developments in computing relativistic effects in cosmology, and is in two parts. In the first part, the general relativistic formulations of the observed over-density of galaxies are discussed (Yoo 2014, Camille 2014, Schmidt and Jeong 2014). Compared with the standard Newtonian formulation, the GR formula for observed galaxy number count includes various relativistic corrections that become important on large scales. These corrections must be included in the computation of statistics of galaxy distribution using the angular power spectrum and the correlation function on very large scales. They are crucial in exploiting all the information contained in the future galaxy surveys, and develop novel tests of gravity on the largest scale in the Universe.
In the second part, relativistic effects on the formation of large-scale structures are discussed. On large scales, Newtonian N-body simulations need to be translated into general relativistic cosmological models using a suitable 'dictionary' (Green and Wald 2014). Initial conditions for N-body simulations are usually generated in the Newtonian framework. These initial conditions are set at high redshifts, where the horizon scale can be smaller than the size of the simulation box. Thus the validity of using the Newtonian framework must be re-examined carefully (Rigopoulos 2014). On large scales, the post-Newtonian correction is important in describing the non-linear dynamics of dark matter perturbation, which leaves a distinct signature as a scale-dependent correction to the galaxy bias (Villa, Verde and Matarrese 2014). On small scales, there are several approaches to go beyond the Newtonian approach. One is to develop the post-Newtonian approximation to the cosmological perturbations (Villa, Verde and Matarrese 2014). The other is to develop a new algorithm for general relativistic N-body simulations. Post-Newtonian effects can be also extracted from Newtonian simulations, and this can be used to estimate the magnitude of the post-Newtonian effects (Adamek, Durrer and Kunz 2014). Based on these developments, we can answer the question of how well our Universe is described by the homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann–Robertson–Walker model with Newtonian perturbations (Green and Wald 2014).
In summary, this focus issue contains a selection of articles by the authors who pioneered the development in our understanding of general relativistic effects in cosmological observations, and we hope it will provide the basis for further advancement of the field.
The articles listed below are the first accepted contributions to the collection, and further additions will appear on an ongoing basis.
Relativistic effect in galaxy clustering
Jaiyul Yoo 2014 Class. Quantum Grav. 31 234001
The general relativistic description of galaxy clustering provides a complete and unified treatment of all the effects in galaxy clustering such as the redshift-space distortion, gravitational lensing, Sachs–Wolfe effects, and their relativistic effects. In particular, the relativistic description resolves the gauge issues in the standard Newtonian description of galaxy clustering by providing the gauge-invariant expression for the observed galaxy number density. The relativistic effect in galaxy clustering is significant on large scales, in which dark energy models or alternative theories of modified gravity deviate from general relativity. In this paper, we review the relativistic effect in galaxy clustering by providing a pedagogical derivation of the relativistic formula and by computing the observed galaxy two-point statistics. The relativistic description of galaxy clustering is an essential tool for testing general relativity and probing the early Universe on large scales in the era of precision cosmology.
Isolating relativistic effects in large-scale structure
Camille Bonvin 2014 Class. Quantum Grav. 31 234002
We present a fully relativistic calculation of the observed galaxy number counts in the linear regime. We show that besides the density fluctuations and redshift-space distortions, various relativistic effects contribute to observations at large scales. These effects all have the same physical origin: they result from the fact that our coordinate system, namely the galaxy redshift and the incoming photons' direction, is distorted by inhomogeneities in our Universe. We then discuss the impact of the relativistic effects on the angular power spectrum and on the two-point correlation function in configuration space. We show that the latter is very well adapted to isolate the relativistic effects since it naturally makes use of the symmetries of the different contributions. In particular, we discuss how the Doppler effect and the gravitational redshift distortions can be isolated by looking for a dipole in the cross-correlation function between a bright and a faint population of galaxies.
Large-scale structure observables in general relativity
Donghui Jeong and Fabian Schmidt 2015 Class. Quantum Grav. 32 044001
We review recent studies that rigorously define several key observables of the large-scale structure of the Universe in a general relativistic context. Specifically, we consider (i) redshift perturbation of cosmic clock events; (ii) distortion of cosmic rulers, including weak lensing shear and magnification; and (iii) observed number density of tracers of the large-scale structure. We provide covariant and gauge-invariant expressions of these observables. Our expressions are given for a linearly perturbed flat Friedmann–Robertson–Walker metric including scalar, vector, and tensor metric perturbations. While we restrict ourselves to linear order in perturbation theory, the approach can be straightforwardly generalized to higher order.
How well is our Universe described by an FLRW model?
Stephen R Green and Robert M Wald 2014 Class. Quantum Grav. 31 234003
Extremely well! In the ΛCDM model, the spacetime metric, gab, of our Universe is approximated by an FLRW metric,
, to about one part in 104 or better on both large and small scales, except in the immediate vicinity of very strong field objects, such as black holes. However, derivatives of gab are not close to derivatives of
, so there can be significant differences in the behavior of geodesics and huge differences in curvature. Consequently, observable quantities in the actual Universe may differ significantly from the corresponding observables in the FLRW model. Nevertheless, as we shall review here, we have proven general results showing that—within the framework of our approach to treating backreaction—the large matter inhomogeneities that occur on small scales cannot produce significant effects on large scales, so
satisfies Einsteinʼs equation with the averaged stress–energy tensor of matter as its source. We discuss the flaws in some other approaches that have suggested that large backreaction effects may occur. As we also will review here, with a suitable 'dictionary,' Newtonian cosmologies provide excellent approximations to cosmological solutions to Einsteinʼs equation (with dust and a cosmological constant) on all scales. Our results thereby provide strong justification for the mathematical consistency and validity of the ΛCDM model within the context of general relativistic cosmology.
A relativistic view on large scale N-body simulations
Cornelius Rampf et al 2014 Class. Quantum Grav. 31 234004
We discuss the relation between the output of Newtonian N-body simulations on scales that approach or exceed the particle horizon to the description of general relativity. At leading order, the Zeldovich approximation is correct on large scales, coinciding with the general relativistic result. At second order in the initial metric potential, the trajectories of particles deviate from the second order Newtonian result and hence the validity of second order Lagrangian perturbation theory initial conditions should be reassessed when used in very large simulations. We also advocate using the expression for the synchronous gauge density as a well behaved measure of density fluctuations on such scales.
General relativistic corrections and non-Gaussianity in large-scale structure
Eleonora Villa et al 2014 Class. Quantum Grav. 31 234005
General relativistic cosmology cannot be reduced to linear relativistic perturbations superposed on an isotropic and homogeneous (Friedmann–Robertson–Walker) background, even though such a simple scheme has been successfully applied to analyse a large variety of phenomena (such as cosmic microwave background primary anisotropies, matter clustering on large scales, weak gravitational lensing, etc). The general idea of going beyond this simple paradigm is what characterizes most of the efforts made in recent years: the study of second and higher-order cosmological perturbations including all general relativistic contributions—also in connection with primordial non-Gaussianities—the idea of defining large-scale structure observables directly from a general relativistic perspective, the various attempts to go beyond the Newtonian approximation in the study of nonlinear gravitational dynamics, by using e.g., post-Newtonian treatments, are all examples of this general trend. Here we summarize some of these directions of investigation, with the aim of emphasizing future prospects in this area of cosmology, both from a theoretical and observational point of view.
N-body methods for relativistic cosmology
Julian Adamek et al 2014 Class. Quantum Grav. 31 234006
We present a framework for general relativistic N-body simulations in the regime of weak gravitational fields. In this approach, Einsteinʼs equations are expanded in terms of metric perturbations about a Friedmann–Lemaître background, which are assumed to remain small. The metric perturbations themselves are only kept to linear order, but we keep their first spatial derivatives to second order and treat their second spatial derivatives as well as sources of stress–energy fully non-perturbatively. The evolution of matter is modelled by an N-body ensemble which can consist of free-streaming nonrelativistic (e.g. cold dark matter) or relativistic particle species (e.g. cosmic neutrinos), but the framework is fully general and also allows for other sources of stress–energy, in particular additional relativistic sources like modified-gravity models or topological defects. We compare our method with the traditional Newtonian approach and argue that relativistic methods are conceptually more robust and flexible, at the cost of a moderate increase of numerical difficulty. However, for a
cosmology, where nonrelativistic matter is the only source of perturbations, the relativistic corrections are expected to be small. We quantify this statement by extracting post-Newtonian estimates from Newtonian N-body simulations.