Abstract
There is an emerging emphasis in science education on engaging youth in citizen science. The goals are similar to other context-sensitive pedagogical strategies such as increasing scientific knowledge and skills, understanding of the natural world, geographic awareness and ecological literacy, and ethical care for biological and physical environments. This chapter explores whether citizen science goes further with respect to citizen development. The emphasis is on how healthy communities and environments are indicative of school achievement rather than students’ scientific literacy. Different limitations for citizen science are analyzed in relation to the challenges of top-down, scientist-driven citizen science projects and bottom-up, community-centered investigative priorities for local choices and policy. Citizen science is emerging as citizens become more fully involved with their community and ecosystems, going back to the basics of civic responsibility and participatory democracy, community capitalism, and a shared sense of environmentalism. A guiding framework for citizen science cultivates the knowledge and skills needed to participate more fully in regional action and global advocacy, and how to address local situations in relation to larger global ones. This chapter takes account of the ways educators will collaborate with members of the community to effectively guide decisions, which offers promise for sharing a responsibility for democratizing science with others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
For the purposes of this chapter, citizens are defined as those who are stakeholders in their communities. All citizens play a role as stakeholders in the commons (Mueller 2008a) by embodying ways of knowing, beliefs and values, and expectations – a group of individuals who are embedded within larger ecosystems. Even as Western philosophers attempt to deny the rights of women, children, slaves, and the natural world, they are equal moral subjects with differing characteristics but nonetheless individuals in relation to others. Citizens may be affected parties without a voice, marginalized individuals or groups, insiders, and outsiders. Ecojustice reminds us that citizens are constituents of personal and collective experiences, who pay selective attention to some assumptions which frame their relationships with other citizens and the Earth. The unborn are also perceived as citizens for those who wish to protect the prospects of future generations. Likewise, Earth’s other species are considered equal moral subjects with differing characteristics (Mueller 2009), which is an extended ideal of citizens of the Earth, and rights for the natural world to reproduce.
- 2.
For the purposes of this chapter, scientific literacy is initially defined as appreciation for and understandings of what professional scientists do (Hurd 1998). This definition is reflected in the Cornell University model, and embedded within the science education reform documents (AAAS 1993; NRC 1996). We connect with other scholars to reevaluate the appropriateness and significance of this conceptualization.
References
Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aslaksen, J., & Myhr, A. I. (2007). “The worth of a wildflower”: Precautionary perspectives on the environmental risk of GMOs. Ecological Economics, 60, 489–497.
Banks, D. L., Elser, M., & Saltz, C. (2005). Analysis of the K–12 component of the Central Arizona-Phoenix long-term ecological research (CAP LTER) project 1998 to 2002. Environmental Education Research, 11, 649–663.
Berry, W. (2000). Life is a miracle: An essay against the modern superstition. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.
Bowers, C. A. (2006). Revitalizing the commons: Cultural and educational sites of resistance and affirmation. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books
Brewer, C. A. (2002). Conservation education partnerships in schoolyard laboratories: A call back to action. Conservation Biology, 16, 577–579.
Brewer, C. A., & Gross, L. J. (2003). Training ecologists to think with uncertainty in mind. Ecology, 84, 1412–1414.
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1099–1121.
Boyd, S. F. (2001). Sustainable communities and the future of community movements. National Civic Review, 90, 385–390.
Canfield, D. E., Brown, C. D., Bachmann, R. W., & Hoyer, M. V. (2002). Volunteer lake monitoring: Testing the reliability of data collected by the Florida LAKEWATCH program. Lake and Reservoir Management, 18(1), 1–9.
Chopyak, J. (2001). Citizen participation and democracy: Examples in science and technology. National Civic Review, 90, 375–383.
Citizen Science Toolkit Conference. (2008). What is this, “citizen science”? Retrieved October 7, 2008, from www.citizenscience.org/conference
Droege, S. (2007, June). Just because you paid them doesn’t mean their data are better. Paper presented at the Citizen Science Toolkit Conference, Ithaca, NY.
Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261–295.
Engel, S. R., & Voshell, J. R. (2002). Volunteer biological monitoring: Can it accurately assess the ecological condition of streams? American Entomologist, 48(3), 164–177.
Ely, E. (2008). Volunteer monitoring & the democratization of science. The Volunteer Monitor, 19(1), 1–5.
Elser, M., Musheno, B., & Saltz, C. (2003). Backyard ecology. Science Teacher, 70(5), 44–45.
Evans, C., Abrams, E., Reitsma, R., Roux, K., Salmonsen, L., & Marra, P. P. (2005). The neighborhood nestwatch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19, 589–594.
Fogleman, T., & Curran, M.C. (2008). How accurate are student-collected data? Science Teacher, 75(4), 30–35.
Fore, L. S., Paulsen, K., O’Laughlin, K. (2001). Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshwater Biology, 46(1), 109–123.
Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science education through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 860–877.
Hogan, K. (2002). Pitfalls of community-based learning: How power dynamics limit adolescents’ trajectories of growth and participation. Teachers College Record, 104, 586–624.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 407–416.
Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703–710.
Jenkins, E. W. (2006). School science and citizenship: Whose science and whose citizenship? The Curriculum Journal, 17, 197–211.
Jones, K., & Colby, J. (2001). Healthy communities: Beyond civic virtue. National Civic Review, 90, 363–373.
Jordan, R., Singer, F., Vaughan, J., Berkowitz, A. (2009). What should every citizen know about ecology? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 495–500.
Kahne, J. E., & Sporte, S. E. (2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation. American Education Research Journal, 45, 738–766.
Kitchens, R. (2008). Community capitalism: Going back to basics to revitalize cities. National Civic Review, 97(2), 38–44.
Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Mueller, M. P. (2008a). Ecojustice as ecological literacy is much more than being “green!” Educational Studies, 44, 155–166.
Mueller, M. P. (2009). Educational Reflections on the “Ecological Crisis”: EcoJustice, Environmentalism, and Sustainability. Science & Education, 18(8), 1031–1055
Mueller, M. P., & Bentley, M. L. (2007). Beyond the “decorated landscapes” of educational reform: Toward landscapes of pluralism in science education. Science Education, 91, 321–338.
Mueller, M. P., & Valderrama, P. (2006). Crater appeal. Science Teacher, 73(5), 22–25.
National Center for Education Statistics (2007). Digest for Education Statistics. Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved on October 27, 2011 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2008022.
National Center for Educational Statistics (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of US fourth- and eighth – Grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Status of pollinators in North America. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nichols, S., Tippins, D., Morano, L., Bilbao, P., & Barcenal, T. (2006). Community-based science education research: Narratives from a Filipino barangay. In G. Spindler & L. Hammond (Eds.), Innovations in educational ethnography: Theory, methods and results (pp. 345–377). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Our Shared Forests Program. (2009). The State Botanical Garden of Georgia. Retrieved on May 7, 2009, from www.oursharedforests.org/
Phillips, A. L. (2008). Of sunflowers and citizens. American Scientist, 96, 375–376.
Roth, W. M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.
Tippins, D. J. (2008, October). Exploring discourses of relevance for the 21st century: A movement towards citizen science. Paper presented at the International Academic Conference of Indigenous Science and Mathematics Education (translated in Mandarin), National Taitung University, Taitung, Taiwan.
Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., Bascom, D., & Cabral, A. (2000). Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education, 84, 265–275.
Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2005). Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned. Science Education, 89(6), 879–900.
Wilson, E. O. (2006). The creation: An appeal to save life on earth. New York: W.W. Norton.
Woody, T. (1931). The educational views of Benjamin Franklin. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
Youniss, J., & Yates, J. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mueller, M.P., Tippins, D.J. (2012). Citizen Science, Ecojustice, and Science Education: Rethinking an Education from Nowhere. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9040-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9041-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)