| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Ways for virtual games to seed actual transformations

Page history last edited by mfrazier@openworld.com 13 years, 3 months ago

Can games be a way for online "tribes" to begin seeding actual transformations?

 

Tens of millions of people are turning to online games for entertaining quests and adventures. Evoke! and a growing number of "serious games" are beginning to turn these energies into adventures that can help change the world. As strains and pressures mount, communities around the world are likely to increasingly tap the ideas and volunteer spirit of virtual communities through social games to help overcome their challenges. 

 

An opportunity may be in reach for those inspired by the ideas and values of EmergentbyDesign.com (and kindred insights of @johnrobb on seeding Resilient Communities, as well as @umairh on buildership), to respond through a virtual game to real-world opportunities. Google Sketchup and similar tools make it possible for teams to and share designs for schools, residential developments, health and wellness centers, marketplaces, farms, resorts, and retirement communities fit for the opportunities and needs of a new era.  Online tools and templates are making it far easier than in the past to cooperate in preparing related market assessments and business plans. And open source tools, as noted at http://openworldinstitute.org, are making it possible to create eGovernment solutions for more transparent and accountable institutions – removing barriers to the successful launch of new ventures.

 

In the context of game-like "virtual->actual" competitions, such tribes might vie to cocreate sustainable breakthroughs in their areas of interest.  Reviewers or judges might give a boost to the most notable innovations.

 

The most valuable prizes, however, can come in the form of opportunities to turn the visions into actual projects.  As  Greg Mortenson's "Three Cups of Tea" describes, hundreds of communities in poor regions have proven willing to offer land and in-kind contributions to improve learning opportunities. On far larger scale, thriving communities have sprung  on sites such as Zonamerica.com (Uruguay), Freeport (Bahamas), or Songdo (South Korea) in response to seeds from visionary founders.  (A team of California college students, as noted prominently in a NY Times article http://j.mp/cOdmsI ,  helped shape key aspects of Songdo's $25 billion new city venture.)

 

Inspiring projects might draw online and local volunteers. They could be rewarded through karma points/social currencies such as outlined at http://j.mp/anwX33 & http://j.mp/bKgs6W  (Openworld Freedompoints),  http://j.mp/hAPb9V  (John Robb's Metacurrencies), and http://j.mp/iaUzxS (Saul Goldman's cell phone-recorded actions earning symbolic rewards).  Allies to help fund actual projects might be found via GlobalGiving, Kickstarter, TippingBucket, Kiva, and Prosper. In areas struggling with poverty and/or high unemployment, local communities could review a range of virtually-mapped project opportunities, choose ones that look to add value, and directly work out with the online tribes the types of global partnerships to move from ideas to action. 

 

Successful projects resulting from the virtual->actual partnerships might also generate assets for local good causes, as well as for highly rated online volunteers who help bring the projects into being. On the horizon may be opportunities to spark formation of "intentional communities" that can attract investors and/or migrants seeking better futures, in ways that can awaken assets for aligned causes.  Early ideas on partnerships to share the benefits of rising land values on this are outlined at www.openworld.com and in slides at http://j.mp/aSKLHX .

 

If a virtual->actual game has the potential to produce such outcomes, it may prove an absorbing and exciting one to play in. What do you think?

Comments (2)

Michael J said

at 8:53 am on Apr 18, 2010

Under the rubric of "any and all comments"

It might be worth thinking about the notion that much of civilized life is a game, in the sense that there are relatively clear rules of play and it is possible to know whether one has won or lost. I guess the point is that games are so satisfying because, 1. There are no legacy indicators of success. Rich or poor, "smart" or dumb has little to do with the perceived chance to succeed. 2. The rules are clear and because of the voluntary nature of submission to the rules not onerous. Complication and constraint is not the issue. Clarity and fairness is. 3. There are mechanisms in place, often in real world games, to enforce compliance to the rules. That insures the perception of fairness which is the crux of trust.

The single clearest example is not surprisingly the Markets. As long as you play by the rules, winning is applauded. But if you don't play by the rules, then you get into a Morgan Stanley situation. If and only if the umpire is watching and ready to intervene. I think this also speaks to the dysfunctional system effect of moral hazard. While the villain of the Morgan Stanley story is the Morgan Activity Space. The way to ensure it does not scale is the SEC.

I think precisely the same mechanism works in high school dropout factories.

Daniel Durrant said

at 5:47 pm on Dec 8, 2010

Leading a child into a playful environment where learning is facilitated through games, is a lot more constructive than leading them into a regimented school.

I remember in the 1st grade banging my head against a wall (literally) for attention, because I wasn't being given the interaction that I was seeking. Thankfully there was recess. Recess was an opportunity to lead my friends in the game worlds of our imaginations. We became other people. We became our super heroes or whatever.

to this day I bounce around game ideas with friends and many of us recognize that cause-worthy games can meet a huge demand internationally in eliminating some of the unhealthy conditions, here there and everywhere.

so, games are on my mind quite a bit and while I'm not a trained designer or a programmer I enjoy talking about them and have a general sense of what is fun and what is lame. My current gameworld thinking involves collective intelligence and crowdsourcing for the benefit of all. Working with @open_intel (Jan Wyllie) and @ozarkherbs (Elle D'coda) on a game we're calling #survivance. At the moment, it is more of 'tribal' philosophy and I plan on blogging about it soon... part of it involves saving that inner child who was told to be something he wasn't.

for the time being, I'd recommend ebdishers continue to explore gaming/gameificaiton with respect to all "emerging" developments. Note: augmented reality, alternate reality games, forecasting games, and transmedia will only become commonplace as the market forces attempt to steer them all in their favor.

You don't have permission to comment on this page.