Babbage | SpaceX Dragon's aborted launch

Not quite breathing fire

The Falcon 9 rocket's launch is delayed yet again

By J.P.

ON MAY 18th Facebook's share price failed to take off in the social network's mammoth initial public offering. A day later another high-tech firm, SpaceX, shared the same fate—this time literally. With just half a second to go before its Falcon 9 rocket was set to blast off from Cape Canaveral in Florida, carrying the unmanned Dragon capsule into orbit, where it was to become the first private spacecraft to dock with the International Space Station (ISS), the launch was aborted.

The company's infelicitously named president, Gwynne Shotwell, explained that the engine controller had spotted abnormally high pressure in one of the rocket's nine engines. The launch software spotted it, too, and did what it was supposed to do in such circumstances: abort engine five and then shut down the remaining eight. Ms Shotwell pointed out that once airborne, the rocket can run on just seven of its engines, "just not at lift-off".

This is not the first time the mission has been postponed. Dragon was originally meant to fly on February 7th, but has since been grounded for various reasons, including last-minute problems with its software.

Many people are growing anxious. NASA, America's space agency has already given SpaceX almost $400m to develop its rocket and capsule. America, which has done most to bankroll the $100 billion cost of the ISS (which this newspaper has always considered an orbital white elephant with an exorbitant price tag that does precious little useful science). Yet since it retired its space shuttle last year, the country has had to rely on Russians, Europeans and Japanese to fly cargo missions. The government would no doubt rather the hefty sums it pays for their services stayed at home.

Meanwhile, the firm's backers—led by Elon Musk, its founder, who made his fortune with PayPal, an internet-payments firm—are counting on a successful launch to begin recouping the hundreds of millions they have invested. Only then will SpaceX be in a position to begin a 12-flight commercial cargo contract to the ISS worth $1.6 billion.

Opponents of the idea of outsourcing spaceflight to the private sector will be watching closely, too. NASA is seen as a valuable source of pork that may dry up if SpaceX has its way. Other critics, including Neil Armstrong, the first man on the moon, simply doubt that the private sector can handle something that has until now been the preserve of governments. Ms Shotwell is bent on proving them wrong. She will get her next chance when the nearest launch window opens in the small hours of May 22nd.

(Photo credit: EPA)

More from Babbage

And it’s goodnight from us

Why 10, not 9, is better than 8

For Microsoft, Windows 10 is both the end of the line and a new beginning


Future, imperfect and tense

Deadlines in the future are more likely to be met if they are linked to the mind's slippery notions of the present