Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The main questions were whether current passive houses reach the goals, how much
energy is actually saved compared to conventional residential complexes, and what
the most effective approaches are to lower overall energy consumption.
For low-energy homes and Passive Houses, the share of the costly building envelope
in the useful area plays a major role in overall construction costs. The analysis of 24
residential complexes in Vienna (completed between 2003 and 2008) clearly shows
that shape factor and construction costs are closely related. More compact residential
complexes are far cheaper. A shape factor of 0.2, 0.3, or 0.4 m/m results in costs of
around 1,300, 1,400 or 1,500 /m. Passive Houses cost roughly the same as
low-energy homes. 1 (see figure)
Figure: Effect of shape factor on construction costs per useful living area (ULA)
1
Remark by the editor: But Passive Houses (PH) consume only some 33% of the heating energy of the low
energy houses (NEH).
Comparison Calculation (grey)
and Measurements (green)
very good coincidence with
Passive Houses
LEH average
PH average
Figure: The savings are real, measured consumption only 1/3 compared toVienna standard
The paper is published in the
(523 pages, 73 papers). The Proceedings can be ordered online at this address:
http://j.mp/Procedings_14th_PassiveHouse
The Authors:
DI Roman Smutny
roman.smutny@boku.ac.at