Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Despite Flirtations, Texas Agrees to Stay in Big 12 and Save It

Left adrift amid the chaos of conference realignment, the Big 12 on Monday found an improbable savior. The combination of furious 11th-hour television negotiations by the Big 12 commissioner, Dan Beebe, and Texas’ demanding too much from the Pacific-10 have saved the league from oblivion.

The Big 12 will survive as a 10-team league because of an influx of television money from Fox that ensured its financial future and lured back Texas, Oklahoma and Texas A&M — the Big 12’s bedrock teams — who had been in discussions with other conferences.

Although it appeared that Texas was leading a charge of four teams from the Big 12 South to the Pac-10, an official with direct knowledge of the talks said late Monday night that Texas’s 11th-hour demands to the Pac-10 broke down the talks. Texas wanted to keep its lucrative local television rights and also asked for “extra sweetener” in revenue sharing, according to the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the talks.

“It was unacceptable,” the official said. “The talks broke down.”

That put a bizarre end to the talks and helped save the Big 12, which brings some stability to the volatile landscape of college sports and, at least temporarily, halts the creep toward the evolution of 16-team superconferences.

“I’m pleased for all of us involved in higher education and intercollegiate athletics,” Big East Commissioner John Marinatto said. “I truly hope that this ends the conference realignment frenzy and stabilizes the landscape for all of us.”

In a telephone interview, Beebe said, “We’ll keep it going.”

His statement spoke to the future of the Big 12, whose survival could be equated to a 99-yard touchdown drive with less than a minute remaining and no timeouts.

“The decision to stay in the Big 12 represents a consensus position which resulted from a collaborative effort with our colleagues in the conference,” Oklahoma’s president, David L. Boren, and its athletic director, Joe Castiglione, said in a joint statement. “We value the strong working relationship that has been reaffirmed during this process among the conference members.”

Image
If Texas had gone to the Pacific-10, the league was expected to start its own television network and Texas could not have operated its own.Credit...Brian Bahr/Getty Images

That may sound homespun, but negotiations were sometimes ruthless. In the end, money and television proved the ultimate drivers to an agreement.

The Big 12’s television future, however, is complicated because it has two deals — with ABC/ESPN and with Fox — that end at different times.

The Big 12 is making only $20 million a year in the final two years of its deal with Fox, which controls about 60 Big 12 games. The ESPN/ABC deal is about $60 million per year for just 18 games through the 2015-16 season, although those are the top-tier games. The deals also include basketball games, which slightly skew the numbers.

Renegotiating existing deals or providing a new television deal for secondary games, now shown on FSN, provided the fiscal initiative to keep the league together. Although it was uncertain whether Fox renegotiated its existing deal or extended the current deal past 2011, television revenue from Fox clearly had a large impact on saving the Big 12. The new deal could generate as much as $5 million to $7 million per university per season.

The math can be fuzzy. The conference title game, an annual moneymaker for the Big 12, is in peril because the league no longer has the minimum 12 teams the N.C.A.A. requires to hold the game. It could petition the N.C.A.A. to maintain it with 10 teams, and the N.C.A.A. has considered changing that rule.

The counterargument is that with fewer teams, the pie would be cut fewer ways and free up more money. And the new cable deal, which was always considered a bargain for Fox, could be enough to deliver additional revenue.

The linchpin of a 10-team Big 12 is Texas, which would still earn more money than its conference partners through the conference’s distribution plan, which favors teams that appear most often on national television. (The uneven distribution had always been a sticking point for some Big 12 universities. It would have been a similar situation in the Pac-10, and Texas asked for even more at the end.)

If Texas had gone to the Pac-10, that conference was expected to start its own television network. That would have meant that Texas could not have operated its own local television network, Bevo TV, something that would have cost the Longhorns millions every year. During the final stages of negotiations, Texas declared it wanted to keep its local rights. (The key to the SEC’s deal with ESPN is that the universities can make millions from their own local television rights.)

Although the Pac-10 is expected to add Utah and the Big Ten could still explore further expansion, Monday’s decisions certainly have calmed the landscape from the chaos of the last two weeks. Because Texas decided not to venture west, the Big 12 is no longer adrift.

A version of this article appears in print on  , Section B, Page 11 of the New York edition with the headline: Despite Flirtations, Texas Agrees to Stay In Big 12 and Save It. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT