Police Agree to Revisions in Crowd Control at Protests

The New York Police Department, as part of a court settlement, has agreed to formalize several changes it has made in its crowd control procedures at political demonstrations. The department said it would ensure that protesters will not be trapped inside pens surrounded by police barricades, that people will be given “avenues of escape” when police approach on horseback and that the public is informed about access routes when sidewalks or roads are closed.

The settlement comes from a lawsuit filed in 2003 by the New York Civil Liberties Union on behalf of people who participated in protests that February as the United States prepared to invade Iraq. Plaintiffs included a woman who uses a wheelchair and said she was trapped behind a barricade, a man who said he was blocked by police from entering a protest area, and another man who said he was knocked down by someone else who had been struck by a police horse.

“This is a long overdue recognition by the Police Department that changes need to be made in the policing of large demonstrations,” said Christopher Dunn, associate legal director of the New York Civil Liberties Union.

In the settlement, which was approved by Judge Robert W. Sweet of the United States District Court in Manhattan, the police agreed to formalize the crowd control policies in its written guide for officers. A preliminary injunction issued in June 2004 by Judge Sweet had already ordered the department to abide by similar rules during the 2004 Republic National Convention, and thereafter.

Connie Pankratz, a spokeswoman for the city’s Law Department, said the court settlement “doesn’t require the N.Y.P.D. to implement new procedures, but rather, formalizes procedures they already have in place.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

The curtailment of free speech and protest under the past two mayors has been very disturbing, and the police procedures have had a lot to do with it. I still remember going to the anti-war protests and being among the thousands of people trapped in side streets, unable to enter the rally area, or forced into a queue for the “cattle chute” setup which surely must be MORE dangerous to the public (especially in the event of an emergency) than a more open route.

Bloomberg’s administration has also tried to restrict the space in which people can gather for protests — Central Park has been placed off-limits (grass is more important than the people who stand on it!), Washington Square Park is being turned from a public place to a formal garden, Union Square’s open space is being restricted, and organizers find it harder and harder to get permits for any sort of public activity.

That certainly isn’t what NYC is about — or America at large!

Post #1: I have experienced this also. It has gotten so bad in NYC that I (and many, many of my friends) have stopped attending protests because of the inevitable police harassment. What do we do now that the City has actually admitted that the police have been violating our First Amendment rights all these years?

Will this agreement really require police to stop deliberately injuring nonviolent demonstrators?

I was one of the demonstrators injured at the 2004 RNC demonstration on 7th Ave by plainclothes police using their motor scooters to run into marchers. I saw other people being injured when uniformed police on foot, without any warning, started suddenly running into the line of march from the side ramming marchers with metal fences.

Will this agreement prevent those kinds of abuses? What are the details?

Christopher Diamond April 15, 2008 · 2:33 pm

#2: “It has gotten so bad in NYC that I (and many, many of my friends) have stopped attending protests because of the inevitable police harassment.”

That is precisely what they’re trying to do: prevent attendance. It is even therefore even more important for you and your friends to attend.

The American public is far too complacent in allowing our government to globally run amok.

Interesting how the NYPD agreed to revise their procedures based on anti-Iraq war demonstrations. Anyone else remember the Republican National Convention fiasco?

Now that Bloomberg tried to pull a Spitzer and bully everyone into congestion pricing, his tactics and lack of a solid legacy are causing me to remember the not so wonderful things he is responsible for.

i saw the nypd when the hard hats came through wall street and beat up peace demonstrators – they didn’t do a damn thing.

i was in a march in NYC supporting the formation of the “NEW PARTY”; cops lining the route, both sides of the route, spaced 10-12 feet apart and being very threatening.

a cop is a cop. don’t turn your back.

A terrible blot on Bloomberg’s administration.

Yeah. A place a huge amount of blame on Bloomberg. The orders to change the policy (and clearly this policy change isn’t NEARLY enough) need to come from the top. I’m a big Bloomberg supporter, but he really messed this one up.

Instead of challenging the policy of putting protesters in pens, the NYCLU kindly asks that people be given avenues of escape the when police storm-troop their way through. Thank you, great protectors of our liberties!

It is really a shame that we have entered a time where we protect the rights of police officers more than we protect the rights of the general public.

Welcome to the Police State of New York.

I WAS a big Bloomberg supporter, but after the abuse he masterminded during the Republican National Convention I vowed NEVER to vote for him for ANY office again.

He deliberately violated innocent protesters’ civil rights while they were attempting to lawfully and peacefully express their opinions. And it only continued during the Iraq demonstrations.

Bloomberg should be personally ashamed of himself over the NYPD’s abuse of the people it is supposed to protect. He’s getting more like Guiliani every day.

I agree with the above commenters, except to note that congestion pricing is perhaps one of the most progressive policies you can have. It’s a damn shame that Silver did not allow democracy to function by squashing a public vote.

Any sort of crowd gathering is an excuse for the New York City police to put people in pens; its something that brings them great joy, its a perk of their thankless job. At the Christmas Tree Lighting at Rock I got my wrist twisted by NYPD and told what part of English don’t you understand, yet I was just crossing the street to go to work at the Rock. I was incredulous and started screaming ‘the police just twisted my wrist’ until I saw his remorse and embarassment. My ancestors came off of the Mayflower and fought in the American Revolution what part of that do you not understand I told him. I certainly would not spend my New Year’s Eve behind the pens. Bloomberg is the worst, he adlibbed on top of Guiliani policy, no original thought whatsoever, follow the leader, means follow President Bush.

This NYT post hasn’t got it clear on actually what was achieved by ACLU. Talk about vague. Upon research what really happened was that the NYPD was told to adhere to formalized procedures already in place. Do you really think we, the people, are winning this anti-democratic city government? Not so fast, take a look:
//home2.nyc.gov/html/law/downloads/pdf/pr021407.pdf

Avenues of escape? Sounds like a scene from Planet of the Apes.

#9: Matthew, you act as though advocates and lawyers, like the NYCLU, haven’t tried challenging the pens. They have. And judges have upheld their constitutionality. I personally would prefer a chance to get out of the way before a horse charges through than not having that chance. Your discontent is misdirected. You should point it at Bush and all of the reactionary judges he’s put in place in the last eight years…

We’ve managed to pull off 3 consecutive protests without a problem with the police. Imagine that.

To be fair Anonymous, you were protesting the high price of donuts.

The laws governing police behavior need to go all the way to the supreme court so that we all know where we are in America or a fascist state. I remember a big peace Demo in D.C., I think it was the second year, after Iraq was invaded, where I was not allowed to leave a corral when I wanted to. I was near a subway entrance and wanted out and there was only a short distance to the end of the protest route yet they would not let me out.

Another time at the second big immigrant rally I arrived right where they were gathering but could not join the protest without walking several avenues cross town, the uptown for about ten blocks, then back across town then downtown again.
There were hundreds of protesters that were diverted this way. One cop even told me to take my hand out of my pocket or he would arrest me.
I told him point blank ‘Arrest Me” he didn’t. But eventually I expect to get arrested. I am not afraid and I will resist. I will not be silenced!
I am not afraid to say my name!

It’s Freedom or Fascism!

Don’t be afraid

The oppressors are the real cowards