Discovery or Displacement?: A Large Scale Longitudinal Study of the Effect of...
Pda charleston 2010: Patron-Driven Acquisition of Monographs
1. Patron-Driven Acquisition of Monographs: Results and ImplicationsCharleston ConferenceNovember 4, 2010 Becky Clark – Johns Hopkins University Press Michael Levine-Clark – University of Denver Matt Nauman – YBP Library Services David Swords – EBL - Ebook Library
2. Rent Don’t Buy: A Story of Boats, Books, and Bars David Swords, EBL The Charleston Conference November 2010
4. We Don’t rent Pigs Libraries Students and Faculty Publishers
5. University of Denver – EBL Data May-October, 2010 42,000-48,000 titles available 66 titles purchased 1,423 STLs (short-term loans) 113 titles with 3 STLs (339 loans) 137 titles with 2 STLs (274 loans) 810 titles with 1 STL (810 loans) 3,267 browses (under 5 min = free) 2,125 titles
6. University of Denver – EBL Costs Actual List 66 titles purchased $5,076 $5,076 994 titles with STL* $13,475 $76,438** 2,125 titles with browse $0 $163,413** Total (3,185 titles) $18,551 $244,927 Savings $226,376 *Doesn’t include purchased titles with STL **Average of $76.90/title based on 66 titles purchased (average across EBL closer to $100)
7. Redefining the Collection Broader pool of titles for potential purchase The collection is not just what you own or lease More books per user Purchase based on need Collection management = risk management Maintain largest pool possible Removing/adding titles Multiple rules
8. Challenges Budgeting Unknowns How many sales? How many leases? Uneven year-to-year? Long-term stewardship Core collection (of unpurchased material) maintained longer? Differently? Uneven collections?
9. Rethinking ILL ILL/Acquisitions blur Borrow or buy STL for ebooks Purchase some ILL requests STL replaces ILL Logical for libraries Income for publishers
10. Alternate Pricing/Alternate Strategies PDA difficult for: Community colleges, others with high FTE, small budgets Intense users of narrowly-focused collections Differential pricing?
11. Uh-oh!: UPs on PDA Becky Brasington Clark Johns Hopkins University November 4, 2010
12. Survey of University Presses To gauge perceptions of impact of patron-driven acquisition Online survey to member presses of AAUP AAUP: 130 members, of which about 100 are affiliated with U.S. research institutions Requested one response per institution Gathered 42 responses
13. Five Areas of Concern PDA and Host Institution's Library Perceived Impact of PDA Scholarly Monograph Publication Strategy Perceived Impact on Scholarly Monograph's Use In Tenure And Promotion Ebook Publication Strategy
14. Great degree of familiarity 93% of respondents already familiar with PDA 64% from conferences/seminars 47% from colleagues 39% from e-book vendors 14% from wholesalers
15. How often have you spoken to your host institution’s library about PDA? 50%: Never 50%: Occasionally 0%: Frequently
16. Is your library participating in PDA? 46%: Don’t know 33%: Yes 21%: No
17. Potential Impact of PDA on Sales 54%: Negative 19.5%: Positive 19.5%: No idea 7%: No impact
18. What Percentage of Your Sales Come from Scholarly Monographs? Scholarly monographs generate more than 40% of revenue for 60% of respondents
19. How would PDA impact your output of scholarly monographs? 56%: We would publish the same number 31%: We would publish fewer 13%: No opinion/no idea
20. How would PDA impact your ability to forecast sales? 68%: It will be more difficult to forecast 12%: No impact 10%: It will be easier to forecast 10%: No opinion/no idea
21. Percentage of monographs that are associated with tenure/promotion For 39% of respondents, more than 40% of monographs they publish are associated with tenure/promotion
22. PDA’s impact on the role of monograph in tenure and promotion Do you think the widespread adoption of patron-driven acquisition could have a negative impact on the role of the scholarly monograph in supporting tenure or promotion? 58%: Yes 24%: No 18%: No idea/no opinion
23. E-book strategy How does your press publish its e-books in relation to its print books? 62.5%: Simultaneously 19%: 60-180 days after print 15.5%: 30-60 days after print 3%: Prior to print
24. E-book strategy If you don’t publish simultaneously, what is your rationale? 63%: Strategic decision to embargo 56%: Would like to publish simultaneously but haven’t perfected workflow
25. E-book strategy Has your press opted into patron-driven acquisition options offered by various e-book vendors? 57%: No 43%: Yes
26. E-book strategy If no, why not? 77%: Taking wait-and-see attitude 18%: Intend to, but haven’t yet 5%: Don’t intend to
27. The Impact of PDA on Traditional Book Vendors Three Challenges for a Successful Patron Driven Acquisitions Program Develop a new value and service proposition Provide the infrastructure for PDA Replace lost revenue
28. YBP’s Experience with Patron Driven Acquisitions Successful print experiments with several customers Working with aggregator partners to facilitate their ebook PDA offers Working with aggregators to develop an integrated E & P offer Experiments and development have demonstrated how this new approach will work Now we turn to the serious business of meeting the PDA challenges
29. Developing a New Value & Service Proposition PDA is a different business Currently we deliver new titles upon publication With PDA we will present a large universe of content that is discoverable and attainable by patrons – in different ways Vendor provides the service background that makes this new model possible Creation and maintenance of the database – the “consideration pool” Business rules to support PDA Developing tools that will make it easier for customers to manage PDA Currently we are adapting existing systems The Approval Plan and profiling methodology provide a basis for PDA But as the system develops we will bring out PDA-specific tools
30. Providing the Infrastructure for Patron Driven Acquisitions Development of the integrated E & P “Consideration Pool” of content Moving from delivery of books to content discovery and support for new workflows Support for new business functions including: Browse and Short Term Loan POD options No dead ends – a direct to consumer option But we still require speed of delivery for print purchases We are developing a base product – these are the early stages of PDA There are many different ideas about PDA E-books are not a fully developed product yet We have to remain flexible while offering a sophisticated solution This is a continuing project – probably a transition to new business models
31. Replacing Lost – or Deferred - Revenue We are all seeing the decline in print book sales It is doubtful that current margins can be maintained as print declines Electronic content carries lower margins In a best-case scenario the sale of content will be deferred in this model Sales of E & P will take longer Early experiments show use through browse & short term loan but lower sales It is time to consider a new business model to go with Patron Driven Acquisitions Annual subscriptions fees for development and maintenance of the database Perhaps transaction fees In this scenario the vendor is paid for its actual value to customers Something to think about as development continues
Editor's Notes
Time for dataThe schools$/Transaction = LibrariesNo of transactions = satisfied customersNo and value of Visible titles = more out there is better for publishers and much better for scholars