Quote:
Originally Posted by apefish
What's " good for the game" is certainly not a shift in policy that likely has a site making more while players make less.
I think his point was that PokerStars uses revenue from that to provide a more enjoyable experience for new players.
A reg, especially in higher stakes, plays because he makes enough money to willingly forego other employment opportunities to justify professional poker.
Viffer, I'm absolutely certain you'd wipe toilets for a living if it meant enough $ in your pocket, don't be a hypocrite. If professionals don't want to, or enjoy exercising their right to play poker professionally on a site, the greater good of the game is obviously compromised. Now you come in and pin vague amoral qualities on us as a collective (that you actually share!)
It's poker, not ****ing Tiddlywinks.